Select Page

Fire Fighting

There are a wide range of well-established fire suppression technologies, including water sprinklers, inert gases, carbon dioxide, water mist, dry chemical agents, halons, and HFCs. More recently new agents have been introduced including a fluoroketone, a bromofluoro-olefin, iodotrifluoromethane and potentially a hydrofluoro-olefin – an HFO candidate.

Fluorocarbon based extinguishants are described as ‘clean agents’ that do not leave any oily residues, particulates, or water damage and rapidly extinguish fires with an excellent weight to effectiveness ratio. Many/most are safe to use around people (occupied spaces) and offer unique advantages in speed, performance and safety. Many critical high value applications require some or all of these properties to preserve life, property and the environment while maintaining continuity of operations. Clean agents protect data centres and telecommunication networks, power plants and substation distribution grids, airports, metro lines, museums and medical facilities. Commercial airplanes, military vehicles and ships use clean agents. From MRIs looking inside the human body to telescopes looking to the farthest reaches of the universe, Fluorocarbon clean agents protect a broad range of applications and technologies critical to the world we live in.

HFC-227ea is widely used in installed fire suppression/prevention systems to protect essential facilities such as air traffic control centres, data centres and telecommunication networks around the world. HFC-227ea can be used for occupied spaces (HFC-227ea is also used as a propellant for pharmaceutical Metered Dose Inhalers for asthma and COPD). The HFC-227ea clean agent remains in the system cylinder until required to extinguish a fire. F-gas Regulation 517/2014 requires regular leak checks to assure the material does not leak to the environment and is available to extinguish when required. If a system is decommissioned the HFC-227ea can be easily removed, recycled and reused for recharging a system or in new.

HFC-125 and HFC-236fa are also used as clean agent fire extinguishants due to their fire suppression performance. HFC-125 has been used successfully as an alternative to halon for engine fire protection on US military aircraft developed since the early 1990s. HFC-236fa is primarily used in portable fire extinguishers and large flight line wheeled unit extinguishers.

The F-gas Regulation banned the use of HFC-23 from 2016, due to its very high global warming potential and the availability of alternative fire suppression systems.

HFO-1336mzz(Z) is being proposed as suitable for some applications. Due to its boiling point, mixtures with an inert gas such as nitrogen or carbon dioxide would be required. It has an ultra-low GWP and is not subject to the F-gas Regulation phase-down for HFCs.

Halons are very effective as they contain bromine which is active at supressing flame propagation. They were widely used in the 1970s and 80s however, because they contain bromine and have long atmospheric lifetimes, they have high ozone depletion potentials and production of new halon ceased in the early 1990’s under the Montreal Protocol. Halon 1301 continues to be used on all commercial aircraft, supported through recycling of installed fire systems.

The EU banned all non-critical uses of halons in 2003. Critical uses are listed in the current Annex VI to Regulation (EC) No. 1005/2009. All current on-board uses of halons in aviation are included on the critical use list under the EC regulation. Annex VI was revised in 2010 as per Commission Regulation (EU) No 744/2010 of 18 August 2010 which contains “cut-off dates” for the use of halons in new designs of equipment or facilities and “end dates” when all halon systems or extinguishers in a particular application must be decommissioned (i.e. ‘retrofit’).

Some clean agent applications, particularly onboard aircraft, are very challenging and active agents similar to halons are most appropriate. Agents containing bromine, chlorine and iodine typically have lower space and weight requirements which makes them particularly suitable for use on aircraft. Fire extinguishants containing bromine, chlorine or iodine can be much more effective than HFCs, but typically have higher toxicity (lower exposure limits compared to HFCs) and lower stability. A bromofluoro-olefin, HBFO-1233xfB, (CF3CBr=CH2 or 2-bromo-3,3,3-trifluoropropene, shortened as 2-BTP) has been approved for use on aircraft as a streaming agent for use in handheld extinguishers to replace halon 1211. It has favourable environmental characteristics with a GWP of 0.26 and has a very short atmospheric lifetime (7 days).

Fire suppression in data centers

The operation of electronic equipment in data centersgenerates heat. This heat not only poses challenges the ventilation and cooling systems, but also raises the risk of reaching ignition points for the various combustible equipment and materials. Apart from overheating, electrical failures, inadequate maintenance, presence of lithium-ion batteries or human errors are all potential fire risks.

Fire suppression systems are vital for promptly containing and neutralizing fires in data centers to ensure safety, prevent data and infrastructure loss, and ensure uninterrupted service. According to the Uptime Institute, the cost of an outage can lead to a loss of USD 5,000 up to USD 7,000 per minute for an operator[1], excluding the cost of material damages. In the table below, we exemplify the most damaging fire incidents in Europe, which caused losses evaluated to hundreds of millions of Euros[2].

Table 2. The most significant data centers fires in Europe over the last 10 years[3]

Company InvolvedDateLocation
Global SwitchApril 2023Paris, France
MaxnodMarch 2023Ain, France
EquinixJanuary 2022Madrid, Spain
OVHcloudMarch 2021Strasbourg, France
TelstraAugust 2020London, England
Colt DCSJuly 2015Milan, Italy
BT GroupJune 2015Belfast, Northern Ireland

The impact of data center fires extends beyond immediate physical damage to the facility and equipment, often resulting in substantial downtime required to restore operations. Servers’ outage for several hours can strongly impact critical societal services (e.g. emergency services, hospitals, police, etc.). If critical IT equipment is irreparably damaged by fire, heat, soot, or extinction water, the time to recovery can be further delayed. From a business standpoint, these incidents can cost data center operators anywhere from $250,000 to over $500,000 per hour of outage, underscoring the considerable economic impact of fires in these facilities[3].

Gas-based fire suppression systems, using inert gas or clean agent (fluorinated gases) suppression systems, are increasingly being adopted by data center operators in server rooms, and constitute over 80% of the overall market for fire suppression systems. The properties of fluorinated gases make them the solution of choice because they can efficiently control the fire incidents by displacing oxygen and removing heat, they are electrically non-conductive and at the same time they leave no residues and preserve the integrity of the equipment[4].

The global data center fire detection and suppression market is expected to grow at a CAGR (compound annual growth rate) of 7.20%[5].