Flammability
Flammability Properties
Flammability properties determine the ease of ignition (minimum ignition energy) and the pressure rise for ignition in confined spaces. If a refrigerant is flammable, the classification properties used are:
- Lower flammability limit (LFL)
- Heat of combustion (HoC)
- Burning velocity (BV)
These are a subset of flammability properties which can also include:
- Upper flammability limit (UFL)
- Minimum ignition energy (MIE)
- Peak constant volume pressure rise for an enclosed combustion
- Deflagration index, measures the relative explosion severity, calculated from the maximum rate of pressure rise and the test vessel volume
Chart: Flammability data for some refrigerants
Some of these properties are linked. The charts show flammability data for refrigerants R-290 (A3), R-152a (A2), R-717 (B2L), R-32 (A2L), and R1234yf (A2L). This data supports the proposed links between flammability properties and helps explain why only three properties are used for refrigerant classification:
- Lower flammability limit (LFL)
- Heat of combustion (HoC), peak constant volume pressure and deflagration index all relate to how energetic combustion is.
- Burning velocity
- inversely correlated with the minimum ignition energy (higher burning velocities were more easily ignited by lower ignition energies)
- appears to be correlated to LFL and deflagration index
little to no correlation was found between BV and the auto-ignition temperature, with the reason likely being the nature of the standard test for measuring AIT, which is conducted by heating the mixture on all sides.
Auto-ignition temperature (AIT) and Hot surface ignition temperature (HSIT): AIT was originally used as one of the tests to classify refrigerants as non-flammable by UL- Underwriters Laboratories. When non-flammable HFCs were introduced, their AIT was lower than CFCs and UL classified them ‘practically non-flammable’. This had no relevance to their refrigerant classification by ASHRAE 34. More recently, for RAC equipment safety standards, it has been recognised that a test appropriate to a dynamic leak event has much greater relevance. AIT is a static contained event; in contrast hot surface ignition is a dynamic event where liquid refrigerant is sprayed onto a hot surface. HSIT is closer to real leakage events for RAC applications. HSIT shows that for a range of A2L refrigerants, HSITs are > 800°C. In addition, there is an ASTM standard for HSIT (ASTM Standard D8211-18). Independent flammability testing is also carried out, for example by SAE CRPs (Co-operative Research Programs) and the Japan Society of Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers as part of risk assessments for the use of flammable refrigerants.
Flammability References
Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 49 (2017) 662 – 674, Flammability and explosion characteristics of mildly flammable Refrigerants, S.G. Davis, J.L. Pagliaro T.F. Debold, M. van Wingerden, K. van Wingerden. Note, some of the flammability data in this reference is different to that usually quoted for refrigerants, but different test methods can result in different results although with the same trends
Risk Assessment of Mildly Flammable Refrigerants Final Report 2016, March 2017, The Japan Society of Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers
Summary of SAE CRP1234 Refrigerant Evaluation and Risk Assessment, July 15, 2010